logo
Question of the Week
Video Library
Ophthalmology Books & Manuals
Cybersight Atlas of Eye Diseases
The Ophthalmology Minute
Nursing Education
Eye Care Equipment
Orbis Program Features
Free Online Journals
Ophthalmology Links
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Print ViewPrint this Page
2007 Series : January 23, 2007

December 25, 2007  |  December 18, 2007  |  December 11, 2007  |  December 4, 2007  |  November 27, 2007  |  November 20, 2007  |  November 13, 2007  |  November 6, 2007  |  October 30, 2007  |  October 23, 2007  |  October 16, 2007  |  October 9, 2007  |  October 2, 2007  |  September 25, 2007  |  September 18, 2007  |  September 11, 2007  |  September 4, 2007  |  August 28, 2007  |  August 21, 2007  |  August 14, 2007  |  August 7, 2007  |  July 31, 2007  |  July 24, 2007  |  July 17, 2007  |  July 10, 2007  |  July 3, 2007  |  June 26, 2007  |  June 19, 2007  |  June 12, 2007  |  June 5, 2007  |  May 29, 2007  |  May 22, 2007  |  May 15, 2007  |  May 8, 2007  |  May 1, 2007  |  April 24, 2007  |  April 17, 2007  |  April 10, 2007  |  April 3, 2007  |  March 27, 2007  |  March 20, 2007  |  March 13, 2007  |  March 6, 2007  |  February 27, 2007  |  February 20, 2007  |  February 13, 2007  |  February 6, 2007  |  January 30, 2007  |  January 23, 2007  |  January 16, 2007  |  January 9, 2007  |  January 2, 2007

To see views enlarged, click on the individual pictures...

One year after cataract surgery, a 68-year-old patient presents with the above finding on slit lamp examination.

This most likely represents:   

a. retained lens nuclei
b. signs of acute bacterial endophthalmitis
c. clusters of proliferated epithelial cells
d.  a damaged IOL

For answers to the above, click here on or after January 30, 2007.